On Friday, February 01, 2013 01:01:02 Jesse Phillips wrote: > I think his suggestions need implemented regardless of what we do > with @property. I think Walter just felt this would appease the > pro-property.
Well, it doesn't even come close. For the most part, the pro-@property folks want explicit proprties, and that's precisely what Walter is proposing that we get rid of. > writeln = "hi" would not compile with Walters suggested changes. Only because it's variadic. Something like range.popFrontN = 7; _would_ compile. And that's just as bad. We need explicit setter properties in order to avoid letting assignment work with functions where it makes no sense for it to work. - Jonathan M Davis
