On 2/3/13 4:11 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 08:16:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
In brief:
* Optional parens stay.
Andrei
Will we keep the optional -property (or similar) for those of us that
*want* enforced parens, even with UFCS?
No. Thanks for the reminder - I updated the DIP.
Did a sensible reasons actually ever come up for allowing optional
parens on non-UFCS?
This is a judgment call as reasonable people may disagree on it. Walter
and I both believe optional parens are a good thing for D. At this
point, we don't think one more pass through the pros and cons would
change our opinion.
Andrei
