On 2/3/13 11:34 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
You have to consider cases though where you have both a setter and a
getter returning a 'ref value'.
@property ref int value();
@property void value(int new);
For now I disallow 0-parameter top level properties. This is a good
argument for keeping things that way.
* Is it valid to define both at the same time?
* Which one is used for assignment etc?
* Is taking ref values in the setter OK?
How do you mean that?
@property int value(ref int new);
IIRC that was just meant to complement the "is returning ref OK".
Usually nothing bad can happen. Although the ref parameter could be
converted into a pointer with some nasty tricks it's probably not the
job of the language to prevent that.
Yah, there should be no restrictions there.
Andrei
