On 2/4/13, Dmitry Olshansky <[email protected]> wrote: > Unary & is not overloadable, precisely due to confusing mess it can > create (see C++).
Right I overlooked that, but this new rule will introduce a confusing mess as well. Anyway my vote is firmly against it. If anything we should have a vote on it before someone starts hacking on master without us knowing about it (UDA's, anyone?).
