Timon Gehr <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/05/2013 09:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> ... >> Also consider the simpler: >> >> ref int id(ref int x) { return x; } >> ref int id1(ref int x) { return id(x); } >> ref int id2(ref int x) { return id1(x); } >> ref int oops(int x) { return id2(x); } >> >> DIP24 addresses that and other similar cases at their core. >> ... > > Given a noticeable tendency of your latest design proposals, I guess it > does so by disallowing the 'ref' keyword in the lexer stage. :o)
What is the noticeable tendency of my latest design proposals? Andrei
