<[email protected]> wrote: > Timon Gehr <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/05/2013 09:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> ... >>> Also consider the simpler: >>> >>> ref int id(ref int x) { return x; } >>> ref int id1(ref int x) { return id(x); } >>> ref int id2(ref int x) { return id1(x); } >>> ref int oops(int x) { return id2(x); } >>> >>> DIP24 addresses that and other similar cases at their core. >>> ... >> >> Given a noticeable tendency of your latest design proposals, I guess it >> does so by disallowing the 'ref' keyword in the lexer stage. :o) > > What is the noticeable tendency of my latest design proposals? > > Andrei
That was me on the misconfigured phone. Andrei
