Am 07.02.2013 23:35, schrieb Nick Sabalausky: > std.xml itself is known to be absurd. I haven't used it myself, > but there's been a general consensus for years that it needs a complete > rewrite. Attempts have been started, but nobody's finished one, > AFAIK. You could try the XML module in Tango, it's supposed to be > ridiculously fast. > There is also http://opticron.no-ip.org/svn/branches/kxml/
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absu... Ali Çehreli
- Re: std.xml validity checking is... Dicebot
- Re: std.xml validity checkin... Ali Çehreli
- Re: std.xml validity checkin... monarch_dodra
- Re: std.xml validity checkin... Ali Çehreli
- Re: std.xml validity checkin... monarch_dodra
- Re: std.xml validity checkin... FG
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absu... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Stewart Gordon
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Nick Sabalausky
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd David
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd deadalnix
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Stewart Gordon
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Stewart Gordon
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Ali Çehreli
- Re: std.xml validity checking is absurd Jacob Carlborg
