On 08/02/2013 11:25, monarch_dodra wrote:
<snip>
"in" and "out" contracts themselves are flawed in D in any case, given they are
part of
the "called" code, as opposed to "caller" code.
<snip>
I think you'll find that this is an implementation issue, rather than a
language issue.
It's been discussed many times over, but it seems that for some reason it's still too
controversial to get a fix any time soon. Meanwhile, I've filed these to try and soften
the blow:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9482
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9483
Stewart.
