On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
DMD is still consistently faster, :(
We might be getting to the part where we say that code
generated by gcc is still consistently faster than code
generated by ldc.
For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck
-O -m64 -property":
http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png
Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime.
