On 8 February 2013 15:35, Dmitry Olshansky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 08-Feb-2013 19:34, Brian Schott пишет: > > On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote: >> >>> On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >>> >>>> DMD is still consistently faster, :( >>>> >>> >>> We might be getting to the part where we say that code generated by >>> gcc is still consistently faster than code generated by ldc. >>> >> >> For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck -O >> -m64 -property": >> >> http://hackerpilot.github.com/**experimental/std_lexer/images/** >> times3-dmd.png<http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png> >> >> Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime. >> > > Would be intereesting to try gdc as dmd on linux uses gcc. > > What? That's an outright fib. :-) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
