On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jason House <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's all a matter of perspective. I see both as begin .. end. That may be the > same reason why I think addition when I see foo(bar()) + baz(37). The extra > cruft is more or less ignored when figuring out the basics of what is going > on. Agreed. If you tell someone a .. b means a non-inclusive range from a to b, then ask them to guess what blarf a .. blarf b means, I would be very surprised if many guessed "inclusive range from blarf a to blarf b". ... Unless they guess that the fact you were asking something which should be so obvious meant that it was probably a trick question, in which case they'd answer inclusive, that being the non-obvious answer. --bb
