On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:15:17 -0400, Jeremie Pelletier wrote: > Derek Parnell Wrote: >> case [FIRST ; LAST] : > > Personally I feel that your syntax breaks the condition > (6) Must not be keystroke-heavy
Huh?? By keystroke-heavy I meant the number of keyboard presses the finger would have to do to write it. Ignoring FIRST/LAST, I have 3 (three) keystrokes and Andrei has 8 keystrokes? Me = [ ; ] Andrei = SHIFT : .. case > I like Andei's syntax best but as previously stated, its ambiguous with > exclusive ranges. > > Maybe the solution is a second range operator that is inclusive, such as: > case FIRST ... LAST: Which is 3 keystrokes too. Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by saying my suggestion breaks (6). -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell
