On 2/20/2013 4:55 PM, Rob T wrote: > On Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 00:48:50 UTC, John Colvin wrote: > [...] >>> >>> Yes. Shared Libraries Please. >>> >>> Thank you. >> >> +1 >> >> It's the most important issue for me. Particular feature bugs can be worked >> around, lack of shared library support is >> insurmountable for many applications. > > Yes, it's a major barrier towards adoption in a production environment. > Walter said it's now a priority, so I cross the > fingers and hope. > > --rt
It's _a_ barrier for adoption in _some_ production environments. So are many other features for many other environments. It's really easy to over color the priorities based on your own use case. The community is large with lots of needs. Juggling priorities is a very grey process. Hope is about the least likely to produce results (other than maybe disappointment). I highly encourage those with needs to actively help address them. It doesn't take a lot of people to add a lot of value. My 2 cents, Brad
