21-Feb-2013 12:48, Rikki Cattermole пишет:
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 00:57:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:55:00AM +0100, Rob T wrote:
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 00:48:50 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
[...]
>>
>>Yes. Shared Libraries Please.
>>
>>Thank you.
>
>+1
>
>It's the most important issue for me. Particular feature bugs >can
>be worked around, lack of shared library support is >insurmountable
>for many applications.
Yes, it's a major barrier towards adoption in a production
environment. Walter said it's now a priority, so I cross the fingers
and hope.
[...]
Better yet, maybe more of us should start delving into DMD's code...
Currently only a small number of people really understand the compiler,
which has a rather low bus factor. We need to increase that (not only to
improve the bus factor, but also so that more people are aware of
compiler issues and hopefully how to fix them).
T
I just want to say, as I have only worked in D for ~6 months the usage
of Optilink is a real pain.
Checkout this alternative linker:
ftp://ftp.styx.cabel.net/pub/UniLink/
The only issue is that it converts debug info to some other format
compatible with Borland's tools (TDS?).
Couple of days ago I took a strong look at removing 64bit only code from
Coff support and allowing it to compile 32bit.
I failed yes.
But I definitely will take another look into this.
Hopefully learn wayy more of how it works!
--
Dmitry Olshansky
