On 3/16/2013 5:24 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
But Walter seems to think this issue not worth addressing: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9738
Not exactly. I felt: The inline assembler uses Intel syntax, and for better or worse, that's what it is. We need to either stick with it, as it is fairly well understood by asm programmers, or use D syntax. Some hybrid in between will be liked by nobody.
