On 3/16/2013 11:40 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 17 March 2013 at 01:54:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/16/2013 5:24 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
But Walter seems to think this issue
not worth addressing: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9738
Not exactly. I felt:
The inline assembler uses Intel syntax, and for better or worse, that's what it
is.
We need to either stick with it, as it is fairly well understood by asm
programmers, or use D syntax. Some hybrid in between will be liked by nobody.
It is already mixed as regs comes from D. D symbol should behave as D, ASM
symbols should behave as asm.
Symbols and syntax are very different things.
