On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 20:41:23 Walter Bright wrote: > Currently, the datetime unittest coverage is 95%. Some of the 0 cases > suggest low hanging fruit.
I should take another look at those. I thought that I had it at more like 98% (with most or all of the missing lines being due to stuff like catching Exception and asserting 0 in the catch block for making a function nothrow when you know that the code being called will never throw), but that was quite a while ago, and it sounds like it's now missing some stuff. I'm very much in favor of having 100% test coverage on every line that _can_ be tested (there may be rare exceptions to that, but I don't think that std.datetime has any of them). - Jonathan M Davis
