On 8 April 2013 18:56, Dicebot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 08:31:29 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> D for embedded, like PROPER embedded (microcontrollers, or even raspberry >> pi maybe?) is one area where most users would be happy to use a custom >> druntime like the ones presented earlier in this thread where it's >> strategically limited in scope and designed not to allocate. >> > > Yes, this is one of important steps in solution and some good work has > been already done on topic. Main issue is that it won't be any convenient > unless second step is done - making core language/compiler more friendly to > embedded needs so that you can both implement custom druntime AND have > solid language. Ability to track/prohibit GC allocations is one part of > this. Static array literals is another. Most likely you'll also need to > disable RTTI like it is done in C++/Embedded projects I have seen so far. > > I have done quite a research on this topic and have a lot to say here :)
... so where's your dconf talk then? You can have one of my slots, I'm very interested to hear all about it! ;)
