On 2013-04-08 12:08, Dicebot wrote:
Erm. How so? Same C library is dynamically linked both for D and C
programs so I am comparing raw binary size honestly here (and it is the
same).
You're comparing a D executable, statically linked with its runtime and
standard library to a C executable which is dynamically linked with
instead. It's not rocket science that if you put more into the
executable it will become larger.
If you mean size of druntime is not that relevant if you link it
dynamically - embedded application can often be the only program that
runs on given system ("single executive" concept) and it makes no
difference (actually, dynamic linking is not even possible in that case).
Then you have to include the size of the C runtime and standard library
when comparing.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
