Am 08.04.2013 18:11, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 4/8/13 10:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
<<Originally sent to wrong list, sorry if this appears a cross-posting.>>
Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at ACCU 2013, I've
decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better tools for any
native coding problem than C++.
pigeon[500] pigeons;
pigeons[random(500)] = new cat;
:-)
This is great. Let us know how we can support you.
It would be interesting to hear how your argument for Go addresses its
tenuous interface with C, pervasive indirect calls, and compulsive use
of GC.
Andrei
Lets not forget the lack of generics, the religious view against dynamic
linking and errors for unused variables and imports.
