On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 00:47:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 8 April 2013 at 21:51:11 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 08.04.2013 18:11, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 4/8/13 10:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
<<Originally sent to wrong list, sorry if this appears a
cross-posting.>>
Given that the entire C++ standards committee will be at
ACCU 2013, I've
decided to do a lightning talk on why D and Go are better
tools for any
native coding problem than C++.
pigeon[500] pigeons;
pigeons[random(500)] = new cat;
:-)
This is great. Let us know how we can support you.
It would be interesting to hear how your argument for Go
addresses its
tenuous interface with C, pervasive indirect calls, and
compulsive use
of GC.
Andrei
Lets not forget the lack of generics, the religious view
against dynamic linking and errors for unused variables and
imports.
The error for unrecheable statement is really of the same kind.
I know it is hard to balance these type of errors, but unused
imports and variables seems a bit extreme.
--
Paulo
