On 10 April 2013 21:36, deadalnix <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 17:06:47 UTC, Namespace wrote: > >> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36 >> > > I see no point in adding that much complexity for something that can > mostly be automated. >
Where's the complexity? I find it intuitive and super useful. I personally see this DIP as just fleshing out the functionality of scope that I imagined/assumed from the moment I learned about the scope keyword. I was actually quite surprised to learn it wasn't already like this :)
