On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:37:43 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 at 11:36:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 17:06:47 UTC, Namespace wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36
I see no point in adding that much complexity for something
that can mostly be automated.
Can you explain this a bit more extensively, probably with some
sort of counter-proposal? I can't see where complexity comes
from, this DIP introduces literally zero special cases.
I think he means that the Compiler could/should decide, if
something should passed by ref or by value. But I think that
would be far more complex than scope ref/in ref.
