It is possible, but it heavily crippeles the language and
requires modifications to druntime.
See: http://3d.benjamin-thaut.de/?p=20
Also see my GC free version of druntime:
https://github.com/Ingrater/druntime
My GC free version of phobos (heavily crippeled):
https://github.com/Ingrater/phobos
And my little GC free "standard library":
https://github.com/Ingrater/thBase
Its quite fun doing it when you want to learn new things, but I
would not recommend doing so in a real wordl project.
Given what you have learned about GC-free D how practical would
it be to modify D's core to work without garbage collection and
then build libraries on top of this which make their GC use
explicit? It seems to me that this is a level of modularity that
should have been built in from the start.
