On 02/04/2013 03:13, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/1/2013 4:18 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
<snip>
1) Grammar defined in terms of things that aren't tokens. Take,
for example, PropertyDeclaration. It's defined as an "@" token
followed by... what? "safe"? It's not a real token. It's an
identifier. You can't parse this based on checking the token type.
You have to check the type and the value.
True, do you have a suggestion?
<snip>
Er, do away with the meaningless @? Since nobody seems to have
succeeded in explaining how the @-attributes differ from the rest, it
seems the right way to go.
Stewart.
--
My email address is valid but not my primary mailbox and not checked
regularly. Please keep replies on the 'group where everybody may benefit.
