On 2013-04-24 03:40, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That would mean creating more keywords, which would break code. By using @, we avoid having to create new keywords, which I believe was the whole point in the first place. Which attributes got @ on them was fairly arbitrary, but they do definitely serve a purpose. And any new attributes in the future will probably have @ on them for the same reason.
You can't use the same reasoning anymore since we have UDA. Those will conflict with new keywords starting with an @.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
