On Mon, 06 May 2013 14:40:31 -0700, Iain Buclaw <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6 May 2013 21:32, Adam Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2013 04:32:50 -0700, Iain Buclaw <[email protected]>
wrote:
Well, I'm back home safely and I hope everyone else at dconf had a
pleasant journey home.
To follow up on a point I made during one of the many discussions and
debates at aloft, I think it's great that this has sparked many mini
projects in full speed ahead - auto tester integration with gdc/ldc;
migrating D front end to D. However we don't need a conference to
get
this sort of burst of activity of going. And I imagine with some
efforts
(migrating D front end, for instance) will require more discussions
outside of the ML to keep it moving and iron out issues that can't be
resolved through the ML.
For this I am available on Skype, and would be willing to show up in
any
conference calls (monthly, or quarterly) to keep this effort, and
others
going.
Thoughts?
Regards
Iain.
This is a fantastic idea, and a year is a long time to wait. I know that
Google Hangouts is limited to 10 participants with n viewers. And Skype
supports 25 people in a call before charging. Does anyone know if there
is
a free alternative that supports n attendees?
SIP is a well supported protocol. There are various open source
servers/clients out there that we can use.
However, I don't think there would be >25 people attending such things.
Infact, things might get ugly if more than 20 people join in on
conversation, unless there is some sort of policing going on. :)
Well, I was thinking that more than 25 people might interested in joining
the conference call. I mean we did just get around 85 people for the
conference. Although I suppose not everyone would have time for a more
regular meeting, I could see enough potential interest to hit 25. After
all there are a quite a few of us who are rather interested in moving D
forward. :-)
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
