On 6 May 2013 23:10, Adam Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 06 May 2013 14:40:31 -0700, Iain Buclaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 6 May 2013 21:32, Adam Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 05 May 2013 04:32:50 -0700, Iain Buclaw <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Well, I'm back home safely and I hope everyone else at dconf had a >>> >>>> pleasant journey home. >>>> >>>> To follow up on a point I made during one of the many discussions and >>>> debates at aloft, I think it's great that this has sparked many mini >>>> projects in full speed ahead - auto tester integration with gdc/ldc; >>>> migrating D front end to D. However we don't need a conference to get >>>> this sort of burst of activity of going. And I imagine with some >>>> efforts >>>> (migrating D front end, for instance) will require more discussions >>>> outside of the ML to keep it moving and iron out issues that can't be >>>> resolved through the ML. >>>> >>>> For this I am available on Skype, and would be willing to show up in any >>>> conference calls (monthly, or quarterly) to keep this effort, and others >>>> going. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Iain. >>>> >>>> >>> This is a fantastic idea, and a year is a long time to wait. I know that >>> Google Hangouts is limited to 10 participants with n viewers. And Skype >>> supports 25 people in a call before charging. Does anyone know if there >>> is >>> a free alternative that supports n attendees? >>> >>> >>> SIP is a well supported protocol. There are various open source >> servers/clients out there that we can use. >> >> However, I don't think there would be >25 people attending such things. >> Infact, things might get ugly if more than 20 people join in on >> conversation, unless there is some sort of policing going on. :) >> >> > Well, I was thinking that more than 25 people might interested in joining > the conference call. I mean we did just get around 85 people for the > conference. Although I suppose not everyone would have time for a more > regular meeting, I could see enough potential interest to hit 25. After all > there are a quite a few of us who are rather interested in moving D > forward. :-) > > Indeed. I was thinking more of involving people who are intimate with the various developments in the language. Eg: People who are dealing with rvalues as references may not be the same people who are dealing with migrating D front end to D, or people dealing with CTFE implementation. However we should always be inviting to people who want to listen in on the conversation. =)
-- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
