Thanks for the feedback, I've clarified the deduction mechanism and show how it falls back to normal function template deduction.
- new DIP40: Template parameter deduction for constructors Timothee Cour
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deduction for const... timotheecour
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deduction for c... deadalnix
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deduction for c... Peter Alexander
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deduction f... Timothee Cour
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deducti... Kenji Hara
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter deducti... timotheecour
- Re: new DIP40: Template parameter de... Timon Gehr
- Re: new DIP40: Template paramete... Timothee Cour
- Re: new DIP40: Template paramete... deadalnix
- Re: new DIP40: Template para... Timon Gehr
- Re: new DIP40: Template para... deadalnix
- Re: new DIP40: Template para... Timon Gehr
- Re: new DIP40: Template para... deadalnix
- Re: new DIP40: Template para... Kenji Hara
