On 05/14/2013 10:04 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 07:28:57 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
I think that should be consistent with the deduction mechanism proposed
in the DIP: foo is struct not in scope until template foo(T) is
instantiated.
No it is not. The DIP states "find all constructors".
it said 'Find all matching class/struct types in scope', isn't that
enough
or am I missing something?
To clarify, I've added 3 out of scope structs named A in the example
section to clarify that they won't be included in the overload set.
see the ones marked '//not in scope'
I think the best here is to specify that the rule is the same than
eponymous funtion and IFTY. Otherwise we'll have 2 different specs with
small difference here and there. And that sucks.
There is no spec for the IFTI case. (i.e. what happens if the eponymous
declaration inside the template is an overload set?)
