On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 18:41:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/18/2013 12:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 07:14:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
What default would you use for non-null pointers?
Compile time error as a default sound like a nice option.
Probably too late now,
but that is where most language are going now, and having done
quite a lot of
java myself, I can guarantee you that it make sense.
D has that:
@disable this();
which is not the same thing as allowing default constructors.
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
I played with that. It ensure nothing, convey intent at best.
