On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 20:19:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/18/2013 1:12 PM, deadalnix wrote:I played with that. It ensure nothing, convey intent at best.Please file bug reports for any holes in it.
Many are, but I think that isn't the point we are discussing here.Removing all holes in @disable this will require the same sacrifices at the ends than default constructor would. For isntance, what should happen in this case :
S[] ss; ss.length = 42; if S has @disable this ?
