On 2013-05-22 23:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't understand what you're sustaining. We all want D to become more stable. It's not a smoke screen or a pretext to reject improvements.
It's a big difference say we want D to _become_ stable and saying D _is_ stable. There are many people here using the latter. I don't agree with them.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
