On 5/23/13 3:07 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-22 23:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

I don't understand what you're sustaining. We all want D to become more
stable. It's not a smoke screen or a pretext to reject improvements.

It's a big difference say we want D to _become_ stable and saying D _is_
stable. There are many people here using the latter. I don't agree with
them.

I agree with you :o).

Andrei


Reply via email to