On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 14:37:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
IHBT. You said that to handle multilanguage strings, your
Pretty funny how you claim you've been trolled and then go on to make a bunch of trolling arguments, which seem to imply you have no idea how a single-byte encoding works. I'm not going to bother explaining it to you, anyone who knows encodings can easily figure it out from what I've said so far.

Clearly, we're not seeing what you're seeing here. So instead of making general statements about the superiority of your scheme, you might want to show us the actual code. So far, I haven't seen anything that convinces me that your scheme is any better. In fact, from what I can see, it's a lot worse, and you're just evading pointed questions about how to address those problems. Maybe that's a wrong perception, but not having any actual code to look at, I'm having a hard time believing your claims. Right now I'm leaning towards agreeing with Walter that you're
just trolling us (and rather successfully at that).
When someone makes arguments that fly over your head, that's not trolling, that's you not understanding what they're saying. I have demolished every claim that has been made about single-byte encoding being worse. If you can't understand my arguments, you need to go out and learn some more about these issues.

So, please show us the code. Otherwise, I think I should just stop responding, as we're obviously not on the same page and this discussion
isn't getting anywhere.
I've made my position clear: I don't write toy code. It will take too long for the kind of encoding I have in mind, so it isn't worth my time, and if you can't understand the higher-level technical language I'm using in these posts, you won't understand the code anyway. I have adequately sketched what I'd do, so that anyone proficient in the art can reason about what the consequences of such a scheme would be. Perhaps that doesn't include Walter and you.

I don't know why you'd want to keep responding to someone you think is trolling you anyway.

Reply via email to