Am Sun, 26 May 2013 21:25:36 +0200 schrieb "Joakim" <[email protected]>:
> On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 19:11:42 UTC, Mr. Anonymous wrote: > > On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 19:05:32 UTC, Joakim wrote: > >> On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 18:29:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu > >> wrote: > >>> On 5/26/13 1:45 PM, Joakim wrote: > >>>> What is extraordinary about "UTF-8 is shit?" It is obviously > >>>> so. > >>> > >>> Congratulations, you are literally the only person on the > >>> Internet who said so: http://goo.gl/TFhUO > >> Haha, that is funny, :D though "unicode is shit" returns at > >> least 8 results. How many people even know how UTF-8 works? > >> Given how few people use it, I'm not surprised most don't know > >> enough about how it works to criticize it. > > > > On the other hand: > > https://www.google.com/search?q=%22utf-8+is+awesome%22 > I'm not sure if you were trying to make my point, but you just > did. There are only 19 results for that search string. If UTF-8 > were such a rousing success and most developers found it easy to > understand, you wouldn't expect only 19 results for it and 8 > against it. The paucity of results suggests most don't know how > it works or perhaps simply annoyed by it, liking the > internationalization but disliking the complexity. Lol, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22utf-8+is+the+best%22 -- Marco
