Re: The stately := operator feature proposal

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:14:18 -0400, MrzlganeE <bulletproofch...@gmail.com>  
wrote:

Not a bad idea. But why not go a step further, and make:
   x := value;

the equivalent of:

   const x := value;

?


This one is really hard for me to offer input on:

I could get a lot done with the const version.

I could agree with you for multiple reasons I think,
- const x := 1; still works, yet it's redundant with the = operator.

I think Walter meant:

const x = value;

-Steve