If @= is any more friendly, I could propose it also for const.
- Re: The stately := operator feature ... Timothee Cour
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal Geancarlo Rocha
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal John Colvin
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal Walter Bright
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal bearophile
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal MrzlganeE
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal MrzlganeE
- Re: The stately := operator feature prop... Ali Çehreli
- Re: The stately := operator feature ... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: The stately := operator fea... MrzlganeE
- Re: The stately := operator... MrzlganeE
- Re: The stately := operator fea... Jesse Phillips
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: The stately := operator feature proposal Math guy
- Re: The stately := operator feature prop... Andrei Alexandrescu
