Am 04.06.2013 18:09, schrieb Walter Bright: > On 6/4/2013 6:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> I'm wondering if (un)compress can take the compressing algorithm as a >> template >> parameter. Does that make sense? >> >> Something like: >> >> auto result = data.compress!(LZW); >> >> Then we could pass different compressing algorithms to the compress >> function. > > I don't see the point. Furthermore, it requires that the compress > template know about all the compression algorithms available, which > limits future expansion. >
No the compression type only has to provide a certain api.
