On 6/4/2013 9:34 AM, David wrote:
Am 04.06.2013 18:09, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 6/4/2013 6:34 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm wondering if (un)compress can take the compressing algorithm as a
template
parameter. Does that make sense?
Something like:
auto result = data.compress!(LZW);
Then we could pass different compressing algorithms to the compress
function.
I don't see the point. Furthermore, it requires that the compress
template know about all the compression algorithms available, which
limits future expansion.
No the compression type only has to provide a certain api.
Again, I'm not seeing the added value with this.
