Re: Feature request: Optional, simplified syntax for simple contracts

[TommiT]

On Sunday, 16 June 2013 at 00:19:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
Super awesome idea! How about coma separated expressions to 
perform
multiple asserts?
int func(int i, int j) in(i<5, j<10)
{
  return i + j;
}

Do you mean ...to get more specific error messages than with 
in(i<5 && j<10) ?