On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 02:38:28 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 16 June 2013 12:22, TommiT <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday, 16 June 2013 at 00:19:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
Super awesome idea! How about coma separated expressions to
perform
multiple asserts?
int func(int i, int j) in(i<5, j<10)
{
return i + j;
}
Do you mean ...to get more specific error messages than with
in(i<5 &&
j<10) ?
Error messages would be more useful, and it may be much easier
for the
compiler/optimiser to use this information in the future as
separated out
into distinct expressions.
I don't really know about this stuff, but since assert and
enforce are built-in things, why couldn't they be smart enough to
tell me which ones of the sub-expressions returned false.
a = 4;
b = false;
c = 11;
d = true;
assert(a < 5 && (b || c < 10) && d);
AssertError: { true && (false || false) && ? }
It doesn't know the last expression because it didn't evaluate it.
