Also, if we loosen the encapsulation provided by the package
access specifier so that it allows access also to modules in
nested packages, then why is this keyword even named "package".
Newcomers to the language would be asking us why is this keyword
names "package", when it provides access beyond the package where
the module is in. Loosening the encapsulation provided by
'package' is not logical nor called for.
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: bre... TommiT
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules int... Marco Leise
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules into package... nazriel
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules into pa... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules into pa... Walter Bright
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules int... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules into pa... nazriel
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules int... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules int... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Time to destroy Walter: breaking modules into package... Sad panda
