On 26/08/13 11:35, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Monday, 26 August 2013 at 09:24:57 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
That's my biased review/comment on the numbers. I'll post them here, so you
can interpret yourself.
Units are ms. 1_000_000_000 iterations
Cool -- so, you're getting faster performance than Mersenne Twister for
higher-precision/wider range numbers.
That's not the same as statistical quality of course. There are some general
concerns about Lagged Fibonacci -- see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagged_Fibonacci_generator
I really must implement Mt19937_64 for comparison, and get on with creating
something that tests D random numbers against Dieharder.
