Re: DIP45: fixing the dllimport/dllexport issue

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 06:54:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-08-29 08:43, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
How is this done on linux right now? It does not need 
"export"/"import"
to build against a shared phobos library. Is "import" assumed 
for any
data access and later removed by some magic in the linker?

"export" is noop on Posix. Every symbol is accessible.

C++ is doing its best to move away from it. We should probably 
don't follow that convention.