On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 09:13:02 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
So what should be do? So far I like Andrej Mitrovic's solution
best. But I think we should omit the placement holder so that
instead of "-export std.*" we use "-export std" which basically
means the same thing. Otherwise people might geht the idea
stuff like this will work "-export *.somesubmodule".
Personally I'm ok with any working solution. I wanted to use
shared dlls since I started using D 3 years ago, and nothing
has happend in that regard since then.
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
Here is my proposal.
Everything is NOT exported on unixes system, just like on
windows. It is consistent accross system and provide
opportunities for optimizations and faster linkage.
symobol marked as export are understood as ddlexport (or publicly
visible on unixes)
import declaration marked as export as understood as importing a
module compiled in a shared object. This time, declaration in the
imported mopdule marked as export are understood as ddlimport.
