Re: Replacing std.xml

[Joakim]

On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:47:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
There are several D XML libraries floating around, but no one 
has taken the
time to get any of the prepared for the Phobos review queue, 
and I suspect
that very few of them are range-based like the Phobos XML 
solution needs to
be, but I don't know.
I think it's great that there's no std.xml, as it implies that 
nobody using D would use a dumb tech like XML.  Let's keep it 
that way. :)