and imagine someone forced to use xml who reads this answer from the community :p
std.xml is a must, no doubt. 2013/8/29 Joakim <[email protected]> > On Thursday, 29 August 2013 at 07:47:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> There are several D XML libraries floating around, but no one has taken >> the >> time to get any of the prepared for the Phobos review queue, and I suspect >> that very few of them are range-based like the Phobos XML solution needs >> to >> be, but I don't know. >> > I think it's great that there's no std.xml, as it implies that nobody > using D would use a dumb tech like XML. Let's keep it that way. :) >
