On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:50:53PM +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 9/13/13, H. S. Teoh <hst...@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> > Not to mention, syntax highlighting falls down upon encountering q{}
> > blocks.
>
> Works on Scite.
>
> > (It *can* be made to highlight those as well, I suppose, but it
> > leads to the awkward situation where you can't tell whether that's code
> > or a string literal.)
>
> Well that's kind of the point of q{} IMO, to make it appear like code.
> Otherwise you can use backticks or r"". E.g.:
True, you have a point there. :)
> http://imgur.com/UGUuUGU
>
> (and lol at the generated imgur name)
Heh. Reminds of "point-and-grunt". ;-)
T
--
The two rules of success: 1. Don't tell everything you know. -- YHL
