On 14 September 2013 00:34, John Colvin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 23:03:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> On 13 September 2013 22:18, John Colvin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 16:27:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2013 9:53 AM, "Russel Winder" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:56 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>>>> […] >>>>> > Regarding the dub music genre, it has to be said that > > although it >>>>> > is >>>>> > the >>>>> > root for dubstep and in turn ... brostep, it's usually not >>>>> > > really >>>>> > comparable result-wise and I have a strong desire to avoid >>>>> > > putting >>>>> > the >>>>> > word "step" somewhere in proximity of "DUB" ;) >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps this is the last word on the dubstep issue :-) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.mazbox.com/synths/dubstep/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> Someone should port to D. In fact that's one thing I'd definitely would >>>> like to start a case for - using D in audio processing (eg: effects, >>>> synths >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> Regards >>> >>> >>> >>> Me too. Unfortunately the whole pro-audio plugin industry is completely >>> wrapped around steinbergs little finger, doing everything as VSTs in c++. >> >> >> Perhaps you haven't heard of LV2? http://lv2plug.in/ > > > It looks OK, but VST has an almost complete stranglehold (with the exception > of AU on OS-X I suppose). Linux and open source have really failed to make > much of an impact in the world of audio. Almost all the pros are on > OSX/Windows with £500+ DAWs* and thousands of pounds of closed source VST > plugins. A large proportion of free VSTs aren't even open source. > > *The notable exception being Reaper, which is very affordable and quite > widely used these days.
I've been considering getting energyXT in recent days... http://www.energy-xt.com/index.php?id=0101 -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
